That's right, I'm in a jurried group show starting this Thursday, April 1st -- no joke! -- at The Britannia Gallery (2728 Howe Street). The opening is Thursday night @ 6:30pm, and I plan to be there; Councillor Alex Cullen will be opening the show.
17:17 |
Also got out on the scooters and lowriders this weekend. Though spring shenanigans didn't come w/o a price: I smashed my wrist up pretty nicely after failing to negotiate a tight downhill turn on the lowrider :(
10:08 |
2004/03/26
15:34 |
09:45 |
2004/03/25
15:02 |
15:01 |
. . . don't forget Duneedon!
Hocus Pocus Alimagocus!
11:44 |
2004/03/23
16:02 |
Here's my response:
I agree that, generally, work created by an artist has an implied copyright; but this implicit copyright is far less effective than a registered copyright when it comes to cases of infringement. The trend in intellectual property is moving away from determining the owner of work based on "who did it first" as this is often difficult to prove or validate. Instead, more emphasis is being placed on registering/filing the works with the appropriate bodies (patent- trademark- or copyright offices, etc.), as Jet+Rubble have learned by experience.
Although I agree that mutual "creative types" should be aware of implicit copyright and respect the work of other artists, I don't think it can be expected that artwork left anonymously in public -- in this case, street art -- with no indication of authorship OR copyright would be so respected.
I also find it ironic that Jet+Rubble are seeking legal restitution for artwork which illegally defaces other people's property (advertisements). It seems hypocritical to demand upholding of the law in one case -- regarding copyright -- while disregarding the law in another -- vandalism. While Jet+Rubble find it highly insulting that their work was appropriated by another designer, don't companies who legally buy advertising space find it highly insulting when their ads are appropriated illegally through defacement which detracts from their original intent?
I'm not siding with public advertising and the associated corporations by any means, but from a legal standpoint, it seems equally hard to condone Jet+Rubble.
11:45 |
2004/03/22
Last week I went to Maria Lezon's Wallpaper opening at Gallery 101; cool stuff, you should check it out.
09:25 |
2004/03/16
12:59 |
2004/03/12
14:32 |
10:14 |
2004/03/11
13:19 |
11:25 |
2004/03/09
15:12 |
13:12 |
2004/03/05
11:06 |
10:59 |
2004/03/02
12:25 |
2004/03/01
16:44 |